Dear Dr. _______
Thank you for the documentation
you provided.
Perhaps
we could someday arrange to talk on the phone about free energy
systems, as I believe they are critical to the future of our country
and the world.
THE SEARL SYSTEM
Regarding the Searl system, this
is not a system I have studied. But, if time can be found, I
will see what I can learn about it in the next few weeks or months.
You may also want to look into the work of Floyd "Sparky"
Sweet who also reportedly developed a magnetic system that
levitated.
Unfortunately, I am not an expert
on complex magnetic systems. But I do claim knowledge about many
other kinds of free energy devices. I also claim knowledge about the
physics of magnetic phase cancellation, and that appears to be
involved in levitation.
THE PHYSICS OF FREE ENERGY -- THE
WORK OF JOHN HUTCHISON
Regarding
the physics associated with free energy and scalar electromagnetics, I
must first mention the extraordinary work of John Hutchison. Among
other things, John has been able to levitate 70 pound cannonballs and
has shredded bars of steel with a very sophisticated system that
very few people appear to understand. However, I do believe
I understand his system and also believe I have a good understanding
of the new physics that would be involved. There is much on my web
site about John.
On my web site, there are many
videos which show the "Hutchison effect." I strongly urge
you to examine at least a few of these videos and am certain that you,
as a good scientist, will be intrigued.
Also, seeing these effects might
be able to help you in your work on nano-tubes.
FREE ENERGY SYSTEMS
Let me note that the very best
free energy generator I know of was made by Dr. Thomas Henry Moray who
lived from roughly 1890 until perhaps 1955, or thereabouts.
Dr. Moray was ultimately able to
create a 50 kilowatt tabletop device which was demonstrated to
many people, some of whom signed affidavits testifying to the
production of large amounts of energy. But the patent office
reportedly refused to give Dr. Moray a patent for his devices and government
representatives reportedly said that power development was a matter
for private industry. So, in the final analysis, Dr. Moray's
device went with him to his grave.
All told, Dr. Moray probably spent
30 or 40 years working on his free energy systems which he developed
in his free time while working as an engineer.
Possibly I could replicate
Dr. Moray's devices, as I spent three years studying his work, but the
engineering is very tough -- even though in the final analysis, the
devices seem to be simple in their apparent construction.
Dr.
Moray's devices also reportedly ran cool. And the harder they
were pumped for energy, the cooler they ran. This was very
probably due to the use of negative mass electrons that Dr. Moray
appeared to have made and captured in his circuit.
Since negative mass electrons have
negative mass, they essentially invert the normal laws of physics
and produce power rather than consume it. All of this is in
accord with my theories, however. I know of no one else who has
proposed these ideas, although Dr. Thomas Bearden may have addressed
some aspects of them.
But it could also be the case
that Dr. Bearden strongly influenced my thinking.
Dr. Bearden should be considered
to be one of the world's leading experts on free energy. But the
last time I communicated with Dr. Bearden, who I do not know well, he
had indicated that his health is not ideal.
DARK ENERGY AND NEGATIVE MASS
PARTICLES
As you may know, 75% of the known
universe is reportedly made up of "dark energy." But dark
energy is apparently antigravitic in nature, and the easiest way I know
of to obtain an antigravitic energy is via negative mass
particles, such as negative mass electrons and negative mass
positrons.
So,
is it not possible that most of the known universe speaks of free
energy?
Dirac, the Nobel-prize winning
genius who developed relativistic quantum mechanics, was the first
person I know of to propose the existence of negative mass electrons
-- and this led Dirac to further propose the existence of
antiparticles, which, of course, were subsequently discovered.
So, there is a history of negative
mass particles. Unfortunately, it appears possible that a few
physics theorists convinced the physics world that the idea of
negative mass electrons is nonsense. I believe those theorists
simply reached a wrong conclusion.
STEVEN MARK'S TOROIDAL POWER UNITS
More recently, in the 1990s,
Steven Mark created a system of "toroidal power units" that
are remarkable generators of power, but they tended to run hot.
This is probably due to positron annihilation in his systems as it is
the case that when negative mass electrons are created, they are
accompanied with positive mass positrons, according to my theory.
When positrons annihilate with
ordinary electrons, they make a lot of heat. So, after twenty
minutes, the toroidal power units stopped working due to overheating
that came from these effects, I believe.
A noted engineer, named Jack
Dunlap, said that he worked with Steven Mark and has stated that
the Mark devices did perform as advertised, except they overheated
after 20 minutes.
There are many YouTube videos on
Steven Mark's devices and I have some of those videos on my web site.
STAN MEYER'S WATER FUEL CELL AND
HIS CAR THAT RAN ON WATER
But there is more: A man named
Stan Meyer, in the 1990s, was able to perfect a way to break up
water in a way that produced energy.
Stan had many patents on his
devices and demonstrated his device before a patent examining board.
This is partly documented on my web site.
Meyer
has essentially shown us that there is a way to power the whole world
with the energy that can be gotten from water -- if done in a special
way. This is an extraordinary statement that could give the
world all the energy it needs! But getting the world to
listen is a problem, it seems.
CONCLUSION
There are also other free energy
devices, but the ones I have mentioned are the best that I know about.
I do not want this introductory
message to become too long, so led me just say that I would be happy
to help you in any way that I can.
Oh, but I must add: My research
indicates that free energy systems do not necessarily violate the laws
of physics as they apparently conserve energy by producing negative
energy in equal amounts to the positive energy that is produced.
That would explain why these devices run cool and would explain why
Dr. Moray's devices ran coolest when they were producing maximum
power.
So,
it is a probable fallacy that free energy systems violate the laws of
physics.
You may read more about Hutchison,
Meyer and Mark on my web site linked to below.
Let's please have a phone call
sometime soon. I would love to talk with you as I believe that
you, as a scientist, would quickly understand the simple basis for
free energy.
Kind regards,
Robert Koontz
Robert W. Koontz, Ph.D.
Experimental Nuclear Physicist Former Member, US Military Intelligence Web Site: http://www.DoctorKoontz.com Bio: http://www.doctorkoontz.com/bio/ |